Clueful was developed to address the issue of iOS apps using personal data in ways unbeknownst to the user. Between “locationgate” and the uploading of Address Book data, knowing what your apps are doing with your data seemed like a good idea. Bitdefender rose to the challenge and developed Clueful to analyze your apps and determine what data was being accessed and how it was being used.
In a statement Thursday, Bitdefender’s Chief Security Researcher Catalin Cosoi said, “While most app developers use this information for legitimate purposes, others might not. Clueful was the best way for iPhone owners to know the difference. While Clueful remains off the App Store, we are working hard toward understanding why our app was removed and to develop the app to improve its chances of staying there.”
The issue of data tracking seems to be something that Apple has recently taken to heart as reports have surfaced of the company developing its own tracking tool. UDID codes had been used by some developers in the past for tracking their own apps, but this is now frowned on by Apple and will get you rejected from the App Store.
Clueful hit the App Store after this UDID lockdown, so the change in rules likely doesn’t account for the change in Clueful’s status.
Before its takedown, Clueful managed to analyze over 60,000 apps. Bitdefender said that it found that 42.5% of them do not encrypt personal data, even when sent over public wi-fi, and 41.4% can track location, plus almost 20% can access your Address Book, including sending it unencrypted to the cloud.
Bitdefender did not specify the reasons given for the app’s rejection, but did say that it was looking into the situation and was hoping to get the app back on the App Store.