On its website, Apple calls Thunderbolt a, “revolutionary I/O technology that supports high-resolution displays and high-performance data devices through a single, compact port.”
Apple also said, “Thunderbolt began at Intel Labs with a simple concept: create an incredibly fast input/output technology that just about anything can plug into. After close technical collaboration between Intel and Apple, Thunderbolt emerged from the lab to make its appearance in the new MacBook Pro and the new iMac.”
Electronista first noted that Apple had applied for the name in the U.S. and Canada. The company is trying to leverage a trademark on Thunderbolt granted in Jamaica in 2010 for some extra oomph in getting the U.S. and Canadian rights to the name.
The surprise comes from the fact that Apple itself credited Intel with the trademark on Thunderbolt on packaging for MacBook Pros when the technology was unveiled, as noted by AppleInsider. The reality, however, is that Intel isn’t listed with any such trademark with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, and on May 6th, Apple applied for the mark itself.
This leaves open the question of whether Intel intends to market the technology under the Thunderbolt name, though that is precisely what Intel is doing as of this writing.
When Apple led the invention process for the technology that was eventually labeled IEEE 1394, the company marketed it as “FireWire,” while Sony called it “iLink” (iLink didn’t carry power like FireWire did, and used a different connector, but it was otherwise 1394), and the rest of the PC industry largely called it either IEEE 1394 or FireWire, if they called it anything.
Under this scenario, Apple might be the only company to use the Thunderbolt name, while the rest of the PC industry called it something else.
Another possibility would be that Apple is securing the trademark for eventual transfer to Intel, perhaps because of the Jamaican trademark that had already been granted. Apple could even be grabbing the name before some other third party tries to nab it and extort licensing money from Intel, Apple, and anyone else wanting to use it.
The bottom line is that it is a mystery why Apple is trying to trademark the name of a technology developed for Apple by one of Apple’s partners.