The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

DealsOnTheWeb Daily Deal: OneCall's Weekend Sale - 20 Great Items at Great Prices All Weekend Long

 
Hidden Dimensions - Apple's Success in the Enterprise Won't be Due to Apple

by
February 28th, 2008

"Teamwork is the ability to work together toward a common vision. The ability to direct individual accomplishments toward organizational objectives. It is the fuel that allows common people to attain uncommon results."

- Andrew Carnegie

Awhile back, I read a heated discussion about Apple's supposed moral obligation to the enterprise. The context was that Apple should endeavor to make products that are both fun to use, compelling and check all the enterprise boxes. The failure to fully penetrate the enterprise was presented as a deficiency of Apple's.

I am going to tell you that the problem is not with Apple, but rather it is a cultural problem that needs to be solved by the Apple community and Apple enthusiasts in the work force. I have the weight of industry experience, ten years of this kind of writing and the experience of others behind me. That includes life both as an Apple customer at Lockheed Martin and as an Apple employee over a period of 20 years. That said, get set for a rocky ride.

Teamwork in the Workforce

The most important thing to know about companies, in the context of this discussion, is that they are an organism. They have a birth date and a date with death -- although some companies have more longevity than others. They consume resources and generate byproducts, notably waste and products.

The role of a manager at every level of a company is to ensure the survival and flourishing of the organism, the mothership. The key distinguishing characteristic between a junior employee and a manager is that the employee's number one concern is him/herself: their lifestyle, their working conditions, their pay, prestige and benefits. The key concern of the manager is the health and well being of the company.

No one, absolutely no one, gets promoted to a manager unless they demonstrate over a long period of time that the company comes first.

These, gentle readers, are the C-level executives, the senior managers, and yes, the IT managers. These are the people who map out the internal strategies for the success of the company amidst the challenges of technology and competition.

As a result, if you waltz into the office with an iPhone, flash it around, and sarcastically and disrespectfully suggest that all the mobile phones issued by the company are crappy and stupid, I guarantee the result. IT managers, confronted by this infantile challenge, will stay up nights writing documents that demonstrate a significant commitment to the company's well-being. They will deprecate every feature of the iPhone. Some will be blantant and foolish depending on the time and care taken. Many others, however, will be subtle, powerful, and hard to defeat.

The same goes for the Macintosh.

I remember joining an organization in the early 1990s where, amongst my formal duties, I became the "Macintosh Resource Coordinator." My predecessor had compiled a two inch thick document that explained in great technical detail how Mac OS 7 was far superior to DOS and Windows 3.1. He gave it to the director and waited for him to come to the desired conclusion.

When nothing happened, the Mac fanatic was puzzled and irritated. What had happened was that he'd pissed off the Director with his arrogance. Moreover, the Director had correctly surmised that working with PCs and DOS/Windows was of greater business benefit to the organization.

I learned my lesson and set about the business of learning, as fast as I could, what the problems were for the organization and how best to solve them, whether it meant DOS/Windows, Mac OS 7 or UNIX workstations. In fact, they all played an important role.

Technical Leadership

As I see it, one of the most enduring and difficult problems in the U.S. right now is technical leadership. Young people who want to move into leadership positions are frustrated by what they consider to be "political" smooth operators in the workplace, ridicule them, and then wonder why they don't get selected for senior scientific and technical leadership positions. The reasons are clear. After years and years of sarcastic and abrasive life on the Internet, with no repercussions, they move into the workplace terribly ill-prepared to earn the respect of their peers, work as a team member and use their talents to chart the best course for their company. Instead, influenced by many hours of SciFi with fictional, arrogant, abrasive scientists depicted in movies and on TV, they fall into a selfish, lonely demeanor of intellectualism and snide anti-authority.

As a result, only the people who've demonstrated a calm, sociable, dedicated approach to the company's problems get promoted into technical leadership positions -- even if they're not the best qualified. And if you push these people hard enough, they'll push back. They'll ignore your proposals in meetings. They'll pass you over for promotions. And they'll most certainly ignore you when you rant and rave about how MS Exchange is ruining the company, the IT staff are all idiots, and by the way, where the hell is my fraking iPhone.

Here's a better answer. Read the book, Hope is Not a Strategy, by Rick Page. A few years ago, this was the Bible of the Apple field sales force. It outlined how to sell anything to corporations by understanding who in the corporation was in your camp, who was the stakeholder for a problem, and how to prepare and present a solution for the problem for a manager who is "in pain". If you understand the decision maker's pain, you'll understand how to sell him the solution.

Often, that solution is an Apple product.

Next, look around your own company and observe who the decision makers are for both technology and personnel. Figure out what their problems are. Then figure out what solutions solve those problems. Often, Microsoft, Sun, HP, IBM, Cisco and Linux products will solve those problems. Often, Apple products will solve the problems. Demonstrate vendor neutrality and your company foremost.

Slow down, think about teamwork, and reveal a deep understanding of the technologies. In time, you'll become a trusted member of the inner circle, and you'll find yourself more and more involved in decision making. However, with power comes responsibility. The first time you abuse that power for your own tastes, you'll lose your lead off position and be sent back to the dugout.

The next thing you must do is find a guardian angel. It's just not possible to go against the grain of a corporation alone. With restraint, judgment and superior knowledge of your company's needs and problems, sooner or later, someone in a senior position will take a liking to you. Cultivate that relationship so that when push comes to shove in a meeting, that senior person will slow down the vultures and give you a chance to make your case. If only one senior person appreciates your perspective, your credibility increases a hundred fold.

Another issue is known as protective coloration. If you have an ill-acquired tatoo, have it removed. Lose the body piercings. Dress like a business professional: Dockers and a buttoned dress shirt works in most cases. If you have a Macintosh in your office, and someone asks you about it, the correct response is: "I'm evaluating the Mac for certain specific solutions within the company." When the conversation is over, shut the door and go back to Safari, The Mac Observer, and iWork in private. No lectures. If the prospect of behaving like this appalls you, then think about a different career than technical business leadership.

The absence of basic people skills, lack self-discipline all combined with bad teamwork by technically trained individuals has led to a technical leadership vacuum in the U.S. As a result, the United States has suffered from a long string of disastrous technical decisions in space, technology, the environment and political affairs.

Changing the Apple Culture

For twenty years, there has been a war of wits, technology and preference between the Mac and the Windows community. It's often fun on the Internet, and it's always good for the ego when your personal choice is confirmed by your favorite Websites.

However, businesses have bigger fish to fry. They're deluged by technical issues in a fast paced Internet world, and attackers from all over the world are assaulting their intellectual property, trade secrets, and even the well-being of their network. They often require genuine business partners, not just products, to help them through those ordeals. No one product or company can meet all those challenges, and the sooner Macintosh advocates realize that, the sooner they'll be in a position to help their company.

Those who earn the respect of their peers and grant respect to those who are put into leadership positions will also move up in the organization. That said, technical disagreement in a gentlemanly fashion is good so long as it's understood that not every team decision will always go with your recommendation. That's part of working as a team.

At some point, you'll wake up one day and discover that you have been entrusted with the health and well-being of your company. Your decisions will reflect deep technical insights tempered with an understanding of what your company truly needs to succeed. Some companies can do this, like Apple, by being 100% Apple. Most other companies just cannot. While you may need to move around a bit to find the environment that suits you, never forget that you'll never move into a technical leadership position in government or business by throwing sticks of pseudo-intellectual dynamite through the corridors of the company.

And that, gentle readers, is the cultural change that's required before Apple can truly penetrate the Enterprise. That's when senior managers, trained in Unix, Apple, Linux and Microsoft think and work smart to bring the best technologies together for the survival of the company. Then, the best that Apple has to offer will be warmly embraced instead of being declared as toys.

That's a code word you'll need to decipher. When IT managers call Macs and maybe even iPhones "toys," they don't literally mean a child's toy. They mean that those Apple products are the calling cards of the alienated, arrogant, combative, and selfish employees who don't consider the big picture. (Toys are played with by children.) Apple products will lose this cultural stigma and start to flourish in the enterprise when young, aspiring technical leaders start to put their company first and leave their personal preferences at home.

When that happens, and when Apple has double digit market share in a few years, Apple will succeed in the Enterprise. We'll all look back with amusement on the pre-historic days when Macintoshes were associated with the wrong kind of crowd in the business world and smile.

It'll require the next generation of Macintosh gurus. Are you preparing to be one of them?


John Martellaro is a senior scientist and author. A former U.S. Air Force officer,he has worked for NASA, White Sands Missile Range, Lockheed Martin Astronautics, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Apple Computer. During his five years at Apple, he worked as a Senior Marketing Manager for science and technology, Federal Account Executive, and High Performance Computing Manager. His interests include alpine skiing, SciFi, astronomy, and Perl. John lives in Denver, Colorado.

Hidden Dimensions Archives.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
View Name:Guest
Subject: Enterprise Mac
Close Name:vasic Posts: 269 Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Subject: Pretty convincing argument

I took the time to read through and the arguments make sense. In my view, though, the main question is whether Apple actually SHOULD pursue enterprise market at this point. As much as it could bring good business, enterprise tends to be an enormous anchor around the neck. There is a reason Vista can still run DOS: enterprise. Microsoft has, almost for decades, been held hostage by big clients. True radical innovation was practically impossible without alienating large customer base. Along those lines, Apple was able to conclude three major architecture migrations, with rather limited legacy support between, precisely because it didn't have to answer to large enterprise customers (68k to PPC; OS9 to OSX; PPC to Intel).

One day, I'm sure Apple will be much more prominent in the enterprise. I just hope they will be able to retain their ability to turn on a dime. We all love Apple for its innovation; enterprise is the epitomy of just the oposite.

View Name:Guest
Subject: Excellent post
Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject: Wow, great Outline..

...of exactly why I can never, ever be part of the "enterprise" world you detail. A place that stifles new ideas and subjugates them to the will of the collective? Where personal politics and backroom dealing dominate over rationality and common sense? Where the almighty dollar is dominant over the human spirit and creativity....

Yeah, like I said, not my bag. Good luck with that, those who do think they want to be in that mess. Just don't be surprised when it all goes down the tubes...we're going to tire of this 90/10 income split and the general decay of the current system sooner or later, and sadly its end will likely come with violence, not peace or evolution.

Close Name:jbruni Posts: 101 Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Subject: Good insight

Good article, John. This made me think about my own experiences and approaches.

View Name:Guest
Subject:
View Name:Guest
Subject: Intellectualism
Close Name:j.martellaro -   TMO Staff Posts: 92 Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Subject: Intellectualism

I agree. In the heat of writing an article that large, one doesn't always pick the right word 100% of the time. I have no problem with intelligence, even intellectualism in contrast to emotional decisions. I was really driving at the idea of arrogant pseudo-intellectualism (bad) as opposed to a down home Richard Feynman kind of brilliance and deep understanding (good). I don't know if ideological sums it up either, but at least you get the idea how I'm thinking now.

Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject: RE: Guest

Ok, its funny that you suggest I read Rand, I've read 3 of her books, 2 as assignments for classes, and find her abhorrent, so blinded by her hatred of communism that she frames her whole world as a response, which is so close-minded its disgusting.

My post was in response to the world detailed in the original article, not a critique of organized systems of manufacturing and supply, etc etc, which would have required much more time, statistical backup, etc. I say that because you seem to be responding to my post as though I had written such a critique.

I just have no interest in being part of that systematic approach, to be forced to lobby for everything I consider important, to argue with people whose minds are closed, etc. I thought I already offered my grudging respect to people that do have to deal with and inside of such entities, if that wasn't clear the first time let me know. Hell I'm engaged to a corporate Accountant, the main thing I was trying to express was that I could care less about fighting platform battles with IT/Corporate types, and I don't think Apple does either.

And yes, I do think there is a revolution brewing, and its not because I read it on the internet or some such crap. I actually read a bunch of history/philosophy/etc in actual books, studied it in school, and formed my own conclusions. Go back and read Marx, look at his ideal conditions for a successful revolution and then please form an argument that we're not either in that state currently or moving towards it, I look forward to reading it. As I said the first time, I hope we find a peaceful way to redress the many things wrong with our world at present, I just have my doubts given the history of such things

Close Name:ctopher Posts: 120 Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Subject: Just play nice

What you're saying is, be mature and respectful.

That's the secret to success whether you're working for a soulless corporation or you have a solo gig. As my grandmother used to say, you get more bees from honey than vinegar. It's just common sense.

It's too bad that Macintosh users have a reputation of being self-centered and smug. Not exactly mature and respectful.
http://www.sodahead.com/poll/51207/

That being said, I agree with the sentiment that Apple should not cater to the "enterprise." If a reasonable person finds an Apple solution to be beneficial to their company, then Apple will get the sale, but as a share holder, I want Apple to "stick to their knitting" and make great consumer products. They seem to understand what consumers want and they execute very well. I'll take excellent execution and reputation along with the smaller revenues to sloppiness, a middling reputation and a large but disaffected customer base.

Respectfully submitted.

Chris

Close Name:Mark Taylor Posts: 11 Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Subject: Enterprise

John,
Your article was not only cogent but heartening; thank
you. I must add that DaiMac's comments are not only baffling
but disturbing. So much of life is teamwork, and the angry
iconoclast entertains but seldom enlightens.
Regards,
Mark

Close Name:Mark Taylor Posts: 11 Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Subject: Enterprise Article

John,
I have just ordered "Hope is Not a Strategy" by
Rick Page. I have reread your article several times
and appreciate even more the philosophical implications to our lives, our work, our country, and
the world which you address. Thanks again.
Regards,

View Name:Guest
Subject:
View Name:Guest
Subject: Success and Productivity Sells
View Name:Guest
Subject:
Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject:

Quote
Mark Taylor wrote:
John,
Your article was not only cogent but heartening; thank
you. I must add that DaiMac's comments are not only baffling
but disturbing. So much of life is teamwork, and the angry
iconoclast entertains but seldom enlightens.
Regards,
Mark


I said nothing against teamwork. I spoke against "Enterprise" or lets just call it what it is, Corporate Capitalism. I think the only way we can survive is to work together, but I think the entire system and the way it values prosperity and corporate collectivism over BOTH individual rights (of those not lucky enough to be wealthy and the right color/nationality at the right time) and the rights of our species is fatally flawed if not evil. Its the system that blackens our skies and fouls our water. I propose that we form organizations to reform it, not join those that perpetuate it.

And John basically gave us an instruction manual on how to fit in, how to work as good little cogs, maybe even rise to eat at the big boy table if we play our cards right. If thats what you want, enjoy yourself, was all that I said.

I apologize if my words offended, but the tone of his article rankled, and I couldn't contain my reaction. I maintain that this system has a limited lifespan; I do hope that when it dies it can do so peacefully. Thats the last I'll say on this here.

Close Name:Mark Taylor Posts: 11 Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Subject: Organizations

DaiMac,
You suggest forming an organization to thwart
the Capitalist institutions. A fine idea. Your group
will need a division of labor, communications, and a
common goal that can be quantified to determine your
level of success. Members must be subsumed into the
group endeavor to reach your goals. The group's goals
must be paramount to individual goals. If you accept
this construct, your methods will be identical to
John's, though your goals are antithetical. His ideas
apply to any successful organization, regardless of
its goals, nicht wahr?

Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Organizations

Quote
Mark Taylor wrote:
DaiMac,
You suggest forming an organization to thwart
the Capitalist institutions. A fine idea. Your group
will need a division of labor, communications, and a
common goal that can be quantified to determine your
level of success. Members must be subsumed into the
group endeavor to reach your goals. The group's goals
must be paramount to individual goals. If you accept
this construct, your methods will be identical to
John's, though your goals are antithetical. His ideas
apply to any successful organization, regardless of
its goals, nicht wahr?


Yeah...except he isn't talking about a political/social organization, he is talking (from experience) about massive corporations and government agencies. Its the "political tone" of his article that drew my reaction, not the suggestion that people not act like deaf, iconclastic idiots who never consider the group's goals.

Did I ever say anything like "John is an idiot"? I gave him credit for writing a manual on how to be a certain type of corporate cog, I just don't want to be part of that type of organization at all, and I felt the unspoken implication was "fit in or you're some type of half-addled outcast", again hence my violent (probably over)reaction.

I see it like a dissertation on how to pelt beavers, written in the late 19th century. Very useful to the proper audience, not so much to me personally or many of my peers.

Close Name:Mark Taylor Posts: 11 Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Subject: Organizations

DaiMac,
Fair 'nuff, well said.
Regards,

Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Organizations

Quote
Mark Taylor wrote:
DaiMac,
Fair 'nuff, well said.
Regards,


Hey I appreciate it, I don't want anybody to think I'm a close-minded reactionary, which is arguably a way to characterize my point in my first post, when I looked back at it. I'll try to exercise a bit more restraint in the future, as this was probably not the appropriate time/place/article for me to share those thoughts

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Sunday, October 12th, 2008

Sun., 2:00 PM
iPO Review - Belkin Micro Grip case (for iPhone 3G)
Fri., 7:00 PM
iPO Free on iTunes - Clone Wars, Spaceballs, Silverman, And More
5:15 PM
John Hodgman Hosts SPAMasterpiece Theater
4:05 PM
CNET: Apple's New Notebooks Had Better be Pretty
2:00 PM
Analyst: AAPL Has Hit Rock Bottom
12:55 PM
Ballmer: Macs Don't Get the Full MS Office, Don't Work in Business
11:15 AM
DocHaven 3 Adds Project History, More
10:35 AM
iPodObserver - iPod touch Wins T3 Gadget of the Year Award
10:05 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Apple's Special Laptop Event
9:40 AM
FileWave 3.6 Improves File Distribution Support
9:10 AM
Apple to Replace Defective MacBook Pro Video Chips
8:45 AM
iPO Just a Thought - iPhone Whine and Cheese
8:15 AM
Billings 3 Gets a $20 Price Cut
7:40 AM
QuickerTek Unveils Apple Juicz Charger for MacBook Pro
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
  • OWC: Mercury Elite FW800/FW400/USB2/eSATA up to 2.0TB TOP-RATED Solutions offer High Performance, Reliable storage for all your data storage needs. 500GB $159.99, 750GB $199.99, 1.0TB from $299.99
  • MacPro Memory 667Mhz With Apple Spec Heat Sink 2GB $ 82 / 4GB $128 / 8GB $256 - Click to Maximize your Macs...
  • Mac observers can now play Party Poker for Mac as well as Mac casino games by going to MacPokerOnline.com.
  • RamJet Memory: Mac Pro FB-DIMMs: 2Gig kit $95, 4Gig Kit $179, 8Gig Kit $355! MacBook 2Gig Kit $78, 4Gig Kit $149! Click here
  • For the latest Apple products use Ciao a comparison website to find laptops like MacBook Air. Then find the best prices on MP3 players and use our comparison tool to evaluate cell phones.

  • Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.
  • Special Report: iPhone
  • __________
  • Help TMO Grow
  • Macworld Expo - Hotel Deal
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $96.80. Change Today: +8.06.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb